|
Answer first: A power purchase agreement, or PPA, is a long-term contract under which a generator sells electricity to a buyer at an agreed price for an agreed period. In India it takes effect as an ordinary commercial contract under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The Electricity Act, 2003 enables the routes a PPA runs on and regulates it in one place, but does not define it. What makes it matter commercially is simple: a PPA turns an electricity cost that moves with tariff revisions into a contracted cost a buyer can budget for over a decade or more. In India's utility-scale renewable tenders, 20 years is the prescribed default and 25 years the common outcome. |
Most explanations of a power purchase agreement available online were written for Germany, Switzerland, Australia or the United States. They describe subsidy regimes, market rules and counterparties that do not exist here. If you are an Indian business deciding how to contract for electricity, very little of it transfers.
This page explains what a PPA is under Indian regulation: who the parties are, how the price is arrived at, how long it runs, and which clauses decide whether the cost certainty you were promised is real. It stops at the contract. It does not tell you which route to choose, or what your electricity should cost.
|
Definition — power purchase agreement (PPA): A bilateral contract for the sale and purchase of electricity between a generator and a buyer, setting the quantity, the price, the delivery arrangements and the period of supply. In India a PPA takes effect as a contract under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The term is not defined in the Electricity Act, 2003, and it is not defined in the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission's tariff regulations either. Two qualifications, for completeness: the Late Payment Surcharge Rules of 2022 define “agreement” so as to include a power purchase agreement between a distribution licensee and a generating company or trading licensee, and “virtual power purchase agreement” is separately defined in the Commission's VPPA Guidelines. Neither supplies a general definition of the instrument itself. |
That absence surprises people, so it is worth being precise. The Electricity Act, 2003 does not define the instrument. It does something more useful: it makes the instrument work, and in one place it regulates it. Section 86(1)(b) requires the State Commission to regulate the electricity purchase and procurement process of distribution licensees “including the price at which electricity shall be procured from the generating companies or licensees or from other sources through agreements for purchase of power for distribution and supply within the State”.
“Agreements for purchase of power” is as close as the statute comes, and it sits there for a reason. A PPA signed by a distribution licensee is not a purely private contract — it is a regulated instrument, and a commission has a statutory say in it. A PPA signed by a private buyer with a generator under open access is a private contract, subject to the regulations that govern use of the network.
The provisions that give a PPA effect sit elsewhere in the Act. Section 10(2) allows a generating company to supply electricity to any licensee, and to any consumer subject to the open access regulations. Section 9(1) allows a person to construct, maintain or operate a captive generating plant. Section 42(2) requires the State Commission to introduce open access. Between them, those provisions carry the main routes by which an Indian business can contract for electricity from someone other than its distribution licensee. Market purchase rests elsewhere — on the trading licence provisions and the Commission's power market regulations.
Five kinds of entity sign PPAs in India, and the shape of the contract changes with the counterparty.
There is a further arrangement that trips people up, and it is the common one in India's large renewable tenders. Under the Ministry of Power's competitive bidding guidelines, a central agency such as the Solar Energy Corporation of India or NTPC can act as an intermediary procurer. It is not the end buyer. It signs a PPA with the generator and, separately, a power sale agreement with the distribution licensee that will actually take the electricity.
The guidelines require the PPA's change-in-law provisions to be provided for “on back-to-back basis, in the PSA”. So one transaction produces two contracts that have to mirror each other. Since an amendment to the bidding guidelines communicated in June 2025, where the end buyer is a distribution licensee it must apply to its commission for approval of the power sale agreement within 30 days of signing, if that approval has not already been obtained. If you are reading a tender document and cannot work out who your counterparty is, this structure is usually why.
For how these roles fit together across generation, transmission and distribution, see our explainer on who generates electricity and who delivers it.
This is the distinction most commonly got wrong, published commentary included, and it is worth ninety seconds.
|
Section 62 |
Section 63 |
|
|
What the Commission does |
Determines the tariff |
Adopts a tariff already discovered |
|
How the price is set |
By the Commission, on a cost-plus basis, under its tariff regulations |
Through competitive bidding conducted under Central Government guidelines |
|
The Commission's role |
It sets the number |
It satisfies itself that the bidding was transparent and guideline-compliant. It does not re-price. |
|
Where it applies |
Supply by a generating company to a distribution licensee, transmission, wheeling and retail sale |
Procurement through a transparent bidding process — in practice, effectively all central utility-scale renewable procurement |
Section 63 is a single sentence: notwithstanding Section 62, the Appropriate Commission shall adopt the tariff if it has been determined through a transparent process of bidding in accordance with Central Government guidelines. The operative verb is “adopt”, not “determine”. Section 63 operates as a carve-out from Section 62 rather than a parallel track, and in practice the two do not overlap — the CERC tariff regulations notified in March 2024 expressly do not apply to generating stations whose tariff was discovered through competitive bidding and adopted under Section 63.
Why a buyer should care. Under Section 62 the price can be revisited by the Commission through the tariff process. Under Section 63 the price is the bid, and the Commission's job is to check the process rather than the number. Those are different risk profiles, and they sit behind different contracts. For how the bidding side has been moving, see our review of how utility-scale tenders have been structured.
One clarification, because it is a live error in circulation: Section 63 is not a central-only provision. The “Appropriate Commission” is the Central Commission for inter-state composite schemes and the State Commission for intra-state procurement.
Twenty years is the prescribed default. Twenty-five is the common outcome.
The Ministry of Power's current bidding guidelines for solar, issued in July 2023, prescribe a PPA for a period of 20 years from the scheduled commencement-of-supply date, and add that it “may, however, also be fixed for a longer period such as 25 years”. The wind-solar hybrid guidelines of August 2023 and the firm and dispatchable guidelines of June 2023 take the same shape: 20 years, extendable to 25.
In practice, tariff adoption orders routinely record 25-year terms. Longer terms are possible but need the Commission's approval as a deviation — the Odisha commission considered a 30-year solar PPA where the underlying land lease ran that long, in Case No. 47 of 2025.
|
Worth correcting: A great deal of published material still states that 25 years is the mandated minimum PPA term in India. That was the position under the superseded 2017 solar guidelines. Under the guidelines in force since 2023 it is neither a minimum nor a maximum: 20 years is the default, and 25 is permitted. If a document you are reading cites the 2017 guidelines, it is describing a regime that no longer applies. |
“PPA” describes an instrument, not a route. Six quite different arrangements are in use, and they differ even in whether there is a PPA at all — which is exactly what decides what you pay for and what you are exposed to.
|
Route |
Physical PPA? |
You contract with |
What it changes |
|
Captive |
Yes |
The generating entity you part-own |
Cross-subsidy surcharge is not leviable, under the proviso to Section 42(2). Network charges still apply. |
|
Group captive |
Yes |
A generating entity co-owned by several users |
The same statutory basis, applied to an association of persons. Governed by Rule 3 of the Electricity Rules, 2005, substantially amended in March 2026. |
|
Third-party open access |
Yes |
An independent generator |
Cross-subsidy surcharge and additional surcharge apply, both determined by the State Commission. |
|
Merchant or exchange purchase |
No long-term PPA |
A power exchange, or a trading licensee |
The price follows the market. No contracted long-term cost. |
|
Utility green tariff |
No |
Your own distribution licensee |
A tariff product, not a bilateral contract. |
|
Virtual PPA |
No — no physical delivery |
A generator, financially |
A contract for difference settled against a market price. See below. |
Three notes on that table. First, where a route crosses state boundaries, inter-state transmission charges enter the landed cost, and those charges are subject to a waiver that is phasing down on a schedule keyed to a project's commissioning date. That deserves its own explainer rather than a line here.
Second, none of these routes automatically gives you a green claim you can report. The electricity and the environmental attribute are separable, and which instruments actually carry a claim is a separate question with a separate answer — we have set out what a green claim is worth, and which instruments carry it in full.
Third, the ground under the captive routes moved in March 2026, when the 2026 Electricity Amendment Rules changed how the ownership and consumption tests are applied where several users share one plant. The mechanics are worked through in a companion post. They change the conditions attached to a route, not what a power purchase agreement is.
A PPA is only as good as the clauses that survive a bad year. These are the ones that decide whether the contracted price is the price you end up paying.
|
Clause |
What it does |
What to establish |
|
Term and commencement |
Fixes the period, and the date it runs from |
Whether the term runs from the scheduled or the actual commencement of supply, and what happens if commissioning slips |
|
Tariff structure |
Sets whether the price is flat, escalating or indexed |
Which it is, and what any escalation is tied to. A flat tariff and an indexed one are not the same promise. |
|
Minimum offtake |
Obliges the buyer to take, or pay for, a minimum quantity |
The quantity, the measurement period, and what happens in a year your own production falls |
|
Deemed generation |
Treats electricity as generated, and payable, where the generator was available but could not deliver for a reason attributed to the buyer or the grid |
The trigger events, and who carries the cost of each |
|
Generation or CUF guarantee |
Commits the generator to a minimum output |
The basis of the number. Whether it is measured on the alternating or direct current side, and whether it is a central or a conservative estimate, changes what is being guaranteed. |
|
Curtailment |
Deals with an instruction to reduce output |
Renewable plants have statutory must-run protection under rules notified in October 2021. The Rules establish the entitlement; the contract sets the rate, since compensation is payable “at the rates specified in the agreement for purchase or supply of electricity”. |
|
Scheduling and deviation |
Allocates responsibility for forecasting, and for deviation charges |
Which party forecasts, and who pays when actual generation differs from schedule |
|
Change in law |
Restores a party's economic position when law or tax changes |
How it is defined, the cut-off date, and the recovery mechanism |
|
Payment security |
Protects the generator's cash flow |
In tendered projects the guidelines set floors, not targets: a revolving letter of credit of not less than one month's average billing, and a payment security fund for at least three months' billing |
|
Termination and exit |
Says how the contract ends early, and at what cost |
Termination compensation, and any lock-in |
Two points of Indian jurisprudence are worth carrying into any negotiation, because they mark the outer edges of these clauses.
On force majeure, the Supreme Court held in 2017 that a rise in the price of imported coal was not force majeure where the contract excluded mere price fluctuation, and that relief had to come from the contract's own change-in-law clause rather than from a generalised compensatory tariff. A force majeure clause is not a commercial hardship clause.
On change in law, the Supreme Court held in August 2022 that compensation is restitutionary — the purpose is to restore the affected party to the same economic position as if the change had not occurred, with carrying cost running from the date of the event. That is a real protection, and it is only as wide as the definition of “change in law” you sign.
Where the contracted supply has to be firm rather than variable, the shape of the obligation changes again and storage usually enters the structure. We have explained firm and dispatchable renewable energy and battery energy storage separately.
A virtual power purchase agreement is not a PPA with a different delivery route. There is no physical delivery to the buyer and no open access. The generator injects electricity into the grid and sells it at the market price. The buyer and the generator then settle the difference between that market price and an agreed strike price between themselves. The buyer carries on taking its actual electricity from its distribution licensee.
India now has a framework for this. The Central Electricity Regulatory Commission issued Guidelines for Virtual Power Purchase Agreements on 24 December 2025, under the Power Market Regulations, 2021. They were published in the Gazette on 28 January 2026, and a Statement of Reasons followed on 27 April 2026. The guidelines set a minimum tenure of one year, structure the contract as a bilateral, non-tradable over-the-counter arrangement, and provide that renewable energy certificates issued against the contracted capacity transfer to the buyer for compliance use rather than for resale.
|
Status, stated precisely: The VPPA Guidelines say they take effect “with effect from a date to be notified separately by the Commission”. As at September 2026 we have not found any such separate commencement notification. The correct position is therefore: issued and gazetted, commencement awaited. Commentary describing the framework as operational is drawing an inference the documents do not support. |
A power purchase agreement is read in a particular order, and reading it out of order is how buyers end up surprised by a bill they thought they had fixed. Four checks, in sequence.
All four are questions about the contract and the route it sits in, rather than about the generating technology behind it. Answered in that order, they are what turn a contracted price into a cost a business can actually budget against — which is the only reason to sign a twenty-year agreement in the first place.
PPA stands for power purchase agreement. In the Indian electricity sector it means a bilateral contract under which a generator sells electricity to a buyer at an agreed price for an agreed period. The same three letters mean other things in other industries, which is why search results for the acronym are such a mixed bag.
No, and you will usually need both. The PPA is the commercial contract with the generator. Separately, an open access consumer executes a transmission or wheeling agreement with the licensee whose network carries the electricity. State green open access regulations require both. A related point worth knowing, because it is often assumed the other way round: at least one state's regulations expressly allow a consumer to hold power purchase agreements with more than one person, within the quantum of open access granted or sought.
It depends who signs it. A distribution licensee's procurement is regulated under Section 86(1)(b), and tariffs are either determined under Section 62 or adopted under Section 63. Where a central agency acts as intermediary procurer and the end buyer is a distribution licensee, that licensee must file the power sale agreement for the Commission's approval within 30 days of signing, unless approval has already been obtained. A private bilateral contract under open access needs no tariff approval, though the open access itself requires the network operator's consent.
In utility-scale tendered projects, 20 to 25 years. Bilateral corporate contracts are negotiated and can be shorter. A virtual PPA under the CERC guidelines has a minimum tenure of one year.
Only through a mechanism written into it. The usual ones are a contractual escalation or indexation, and a change-in-law adjustment. Neither is automatic, and both depend on the drafting.